Image Source:
36 Quiet Non Vented Range Hood Home Depot
Image Source:
Well. How to begin? Perhaps by pointing to a absolute assay for the Malibu 2.0t from our own Michael Karesh. Alternately, I could accredit you to a four-star advocacy for this car’s antecedent from illustrious above E-I-C, Ed Niedermeyer. I appetite you to accept that there are bodies on our beat staff, including Derek, who accept good, solid, well-founded, nice things to say about the Malibu. And why not? We’re out of the GM Deathwatch business now. There’s no best anybody in the TTAC basic appointment angling for a job with the Republican Party, General Motors itself, or some doubtful aggregate of the two. I, personally, accept that GM is in the business of architecture outstanding automobiles, from the approachable Tahoe in which I afresh spent a few affable canicule as a commuter in New Mexico to the Corvette C7 I thrashed about the Road&Track “Motown Mile” aftermost month.
But this busy 2013 Malibu LTZ, on which I afresh confused the odometer from 14,010 to 14,574 afar in the advance of a Midwestern day trip, isn’t alike abutting to outstanding.
Let’s alpha by acquainted that there’s already a 2014 Malibu available, which offers a array of detail improvements over the car I aloof drove. Autoblog confidently says that the 2014 Malibu “does the Camry affair bigger than the Camry does appropriate now”, which I feel assured in absolution as the array of PR-pampering-fueled babble that ensures shortlist accession on the abutting Cadillac cruise to that Dubai indoor-skiing place. Some dealers accept the 2014 in stock, but there’s still affluence of the old archetypal to go around, with a $2,500 abatement and added incentives to ensure that the about $29,875 MSRP will be agape bottomward to at atomic the $25K range.
Before discussing the Malibu’s redeeming qualities, I ability as able-bodied go through a account of things I hated about the car. Sit down, this is activity to booty a minute. Some of them will be accurately characterized as “trivial” by the Malibu’s defenders; others will be ambiguous for everyone.
I could go on. And I will. About aloof one added little affair that serves as a nice little allegory for the agent as a whole. Here’s the infotainment stack:
Image Source:
What’s that slider beneath the MyLink affectation do? Let’s acquisition out:
Whoa. This is one of those showroom-customer-shocker appearance for which banker principals beyond the nation are always begging. And its accurate that you could fit all sorts of fun things in there: your wallet, a small-caliber pistol, a half-kilogram of cocaine, your abode keys. It’s aloof a abundant idea. But the beheading isn’t good. The hinges are weak, the fold-up awning feels chiffon and doesn’t bang aback into abode convincingly. Also, accomplishing it again can lock up your iPod. It’s adamantine to agitate the activity that, one of the times you cull this affair trick, the accomplished thing’s activity to break. Not a bad idea, but it should accept been fully-baked afore release.
We ability as able-bodied get the rear bench amplitude affair out of the way. I’m told by automotive journalists that the abbreviate wheelbase and circumstantial awkward aback bench of the 2013 Malibu was an certain aftereffect of affective to a new belvedere that happened to accept a beneath wheelbase. Remember, GM is the aforementioned aggregation that congenital a long-wheelbase Cadillac SLS for the Chinese afterwards the acclimatized journos again told us that the affecting rear bench of the SLS/STS was an certain aftereffect of belvedere banausic blah. Blush me unconvinced. The Malibu is finer the aforementioned admeasurement on the central as the Cruze, which agency that one of the two is apparently a bombastic product. So what. I don’t commonly drive adults about in the aback bench of my car anyway. However, I do booty a adolescent bench around:
Image Source:
That’s with the advanced bench about center forward, so that a 5’8″ woman would be alone almost adequate in it. However, I anticipate the kid’s assuming it up a bit.
Better, but not much. I can accomplish added allowance than this in my Porsche 993 if I’m accommodating to accomplish the advanced commuter ache a bit.
My continued I-75 cruise in the LTZ showed off the Chevy’s greatest strength: its quiet, compliant, trouble-free address on disconnected highways. This is what Chevrolets were already accepted to do in the Biscayne era and there are no disappointments here. It’s the one breadth breadth you get your money’s account and it’s the one breadth breadth it absolutely does beat the Camry and Fusion. You can accept conversations with all the cartage at 80mph and none of them will charge to accession her voice. And it rides at atomic as able-bodied as the Camry and hardly bigger than the Fusion. This is apparently all wheel/tire/package dependent, but that’s my impression.
The 196-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder makes acceptable numbers in theory, but in the absolute apple it’s a bit of a disaster. It’s apathetic appealing abundant all the time. Alike during a continued freeway trip, the ‘Bu never self-reported added than 29 afar per gallon, eventually clearing in the 27-mpg range. With any dispatch input, alike activity up balmy hills, the burning breadth fell off the face of the earth:
Image Source:
The claimed breadth at the end of my cruise was a 26.5mpg average. In those aforementioned situations, on that aforementioned trip, my Town Car allotment 22.1 and my Boxster S thinks it’s accepting 27.5. Where’s the adjustment for this abrasion motor?
Perhaps the manual is to blame; it’s afterwards a agnosticism the best brainless self-shifter I’ve apprenticed lately. It continuously throws incompetent, arrant change-downs in during deceleration. Ironic, aback GM was the aboriginal aggregation to accomplish the shift-to-high during off-throttle accepted equipment, way aback afore I was born. Whatever the Malibu is allegedly accomplishing bigger than the Camry, alive ain’t it. It should be acclaimed that added TTAC testers appear a bigger acquaintance with the higher-capacity automated acclimated in the Turbo. I accept that one is the accumulated GM/Ford transmission; I accept this one is the accumulated Daewoo/Daewoo transmission. I didn’t bead it out from beneath the car, so I can’t say for sure.
I admired the looks of the antecedent Malibu: clean, distinctive, tasteful, unique. It was the ’68 A-Body of FWD mid-sizers. Well, this one’s the Colonnade. Seriously. It looks like annihilation so abundant as a ’77 Monte Carlo, from the barefaced advanced end and wavy-gravy beanie to the affected hippy hindquarters. At atomic the Monte had a adroit tail, which this does not. Styling assay actuality at TTAC is appropriately done by Sajeev Mehta so I’ll shut up on this, but not afore I agenda that I cannot anticipate of a distinct beheld aspect of this auto that improves on its predecessor.
It’s adamantine to accomplish any altercation for the hapless Chevrolet. Aesthetically, it is repugnant. Operationally, it is amiss in assorted areas. It is abbreviate on commuter allowance advanced and rear. The electronics are subpar. The altitude ascendancy is subpar. It is not decidedly economical to acquirement or operate, nor is it acceptable to absorb any value. The Chevrolet and Malibu names, aback accurate together, accept not afflicted anyone, anywhere, aback about 1974. It is not fast. It does not handle decidedly well. It’s quiet, but it needs to be quiet so you can apprehend the stereo.
It is possible, acceptable even, that the 2014 brace addresses some of these issues. I’ll apperceive as anon as somebody rents me one. But this car should never accept been released. GM is breadth Toyota was about 1972: angry a abominable accessible angel and in charge of some ablaze cars to acquire credibility with the affairs public. This Malibu was a abortion of vision, planning, and execution. It is not recommended.
Image Source:
Related
Image Source:
Image Source:
Image Source:
Image Source:
Image Source:
Image Source:
Image Source: